What we’ve heard: Public input in this process has strongly supported the idea that Raleigh should grow much more around transit and walking than it has in the past. In surveys and workshops, participants overwhelmingly selected the most “grow around transit” option. They indicated that it is very important to reduce carbon emissions by allowing more people to live in work in walkable places near transit.

In response to what we’ve heard, the EDAT plan recommends:

  • Allow additional height around BRT stations, including up to 12 stories in the core of "Emerging Urban Centers." In the larger of these centers, such as New Bern Avenue east of 440, heights of up to 20 stories could be appropriate. In smaller areas ("Neighborhood Centers"), height in core station areas could go up to seven stories. In both cases, heights would transition down to the lower-scale areas nearby.
  • Prioritizing sidewalk projects within a half mile of BRT
  • Addressing traffic speeds and unsafe intersections
  • Creating bike/scooter lanes to link to BRT stations
  • Encouraging pedestrian-friendly design and a mix of uses in BRT areas

Question title

How well do these recommendations meet the goal of growing around transit?

Loading question...

What we’ve heard: The other key goal of this project is contained in the word “Equitable.” That means ensuring that residents of all income levels share in the benefits of the investment in transit and avoiding displacement in neighborhoods along the BRT routes. Public input in this process made it clear that equity considerations are critical, with participants strongly indicating that ensuring housing affordability near BRT stations is important.

In response to this choice, the EDAT plan recommends:

  • Directly creating more affordable units by acquiring land near BRT stations
  • Creating a zoning bonus that allows more building height if affordable units are provided
  • Allowing more housing to be built, minimizing competition for existing homes
  • Creating an “equity fund” that takes a portion of tax revenue from new development along the corridors and plows it back into affordability and other equity projects
  • Expanding rehab and property tax assistance for existing residents along the corridors
  • Expanding efforts to crack down on predatory purchases
  • Expanding programs for supporting small businesses along the corridors

Question title

How well do these recommendations meet the goal of ensuring equity?

Loading question...